The phone rang at 7:15 on a Tuesday morning. It was a reader from Kuala Lumpur, and he sounded like he hadn’t slept. “Ben,” he said, “I found a gift. A fund trading at 15% below what it owns. Free money, right?” I asked him which fund. He told me. I pulled it up on my screen and saw exactly what he saw. The net asset value was $12.40. The market price was $10.55. On paper, it looked like buying a stack of cash for eighty-five cents on the dollar. I told him to hold on. Then I told him about the first time I made that same mistake.
I was in my late twenties, fresh off a bonus, and convinced I was smarter than everyone else. I found a closed-end municipal bond fund trading at a 12% discount. I remember sitting at my desk, calculator out, running the numbers three times. If the discount closed, I’d make 12% plus the yield. If it didn’t close, I’d still collect the 8% dividend. I couldn’t lose. I bought a pile of it. Six months later, the discount was 14%. A year later, it was 18%. I held it for three years. When I finally sold, the discount was 16%. I made my dividend payments, but the price kept drifting lower. I never got that 12% gift. The gift, I learned, was not a gift.
Here’s what I didn’t understand then. A closed-end fund is not a sale at the mall. It’s a fixed pool of assets with a fixed number of shares. The discount is not a mispricing. It’s a feature. Think of it like a coffee mug you buy for $10. Inside the mug is $12 worth of coffee beans. Great deal, right? Except you can’t get the beans out unless you smash the mug. And you’re not allowed to smash the mug. The only way to get the beans is to sell the mug to someone else. If nobody wants the mug, you’re stuck holding a mug with beans inside that you can’t touch. The discount is the market telling you how hard it thinks those beans are to reach.
I had a client in Singapore years ago who built an entire retirement strategy around closed-end funds trading at discounts. He had a spreadsheet tracking thirty of them. He would buy when discounts widened and sell when they narrowed. It worked for a while. Then 2008 happened. Discounts went to 30%, 40%, 50% on some funds. He didn’t sell. He couldn’t. The liquidity dried up. He told me later that the worst part wasn’t the losses. It was watching the discounts get wider every day and realizing he had confused a structural feature with a trading opportunity.
I keep a pair of scissors in my desk drawer as a reminder. When someone tells me about a fund trading at a discount, I imagine taking those scissors and cutting the fund open. What’s inside? Usually the same stuff that’s in every other fund. Stocks, bonds, maybe some alternatives. The discount isn’t a discount on the contents. It’s a discount on the container. And the container comes with rules. You can’t redeem your shares at net asset value like you can with an open-end fund. You have to sell on the exchange to another buyer. If no buyer wants your container at a price you like, you wait. Or you sell at whatever the market gives you.
The reader from Kuala Lumpur called me back three weeks later. He had bought the fund. Not a huge position, he said, just a test. The discount had widened to 18%. The dividend was still paying. But he was starting to feel the weight of it. Every time he checked the price, he saw the gap between what the fund owned and what the market said it was worth. He asked me if he should buy more to average down. I asked him a different question. If this discount stays at 18% for five years, will you still be glad you own it? He paused. I could hear him thinking.
I use a simple test now. I take the fund’s annual report and look at the distribution policy. A lot of these funds pay distributions that include return of capital. That means they’re giving you your own money back and calling it income. The discount looks attractive until you realize the dividend you’re chasing is just your principal being handed back to you in smaller pieces. I also look at the fund’s history of issuing new shares. Some funds issue shares at a premium when the price is high and then watch the discount widen again. The managers get paid on assets under management. They don’t care about your discount.
I still own one closed-end fund. It’s a global infrastructure fund I bought during the COVID panic when the discount hit 25%. I bought it knowing I might hold it for a decade. I bought it knowing the discount might never close. I bought it because I wanted exposure to the assets inside, and I was willing to live with the container. The discount today is 12%. I’m not happy or unhappy about it. It just is.
The reader texted me last week. He sold his position at a 19% discount. Took the loss and moved the money into an index fund. He said he felt lighter. I asked him if he’d ever buy a closed-end fund again. He said maybe, if he found one with assets he couldn’t get anywhere else. But he said he’d never buy another one just because the price tag looked cheap. I told him that was the right answer. Cheap is not a strategy. Cheap is just cheap.
Disclaimer: Mention of any brand or trademark is for identification only and does not imply partnership or endorsement
